furniture chairs
Furniture Chairs Adirondack Chair History
Related Topics:
furniture
furniture chairs
chairs
bar stools
kids furniture
restaurant furniture
office chairs
living room furniture
tables
bedroom furniture
office furniture
school furniture
home office furniture
File Cabinets
beds
sofas
folding storage
ottomans
barstools
benches
Children
Chairs and Seating
childrens furniture
office chair
modern
Church Furniture
chair
home furnishings
home furniture
furniture store
contemporary
Lobby and Office Furniture
contemporary furniture
Bush Office Furniture
outdoor furniture
restaurant chairs
leather furniture
Desk Chair
Reception Furniture
recliners
|
Furniture Chairs Adirondack Chair History furniture chairs
.
Furniture Chairs Adirondack Chair History furniture chairs Information
The argument of abortion has been raging since the Supreme Court case, Roe
vs. Wade, in 1973. This court case has divided the country into two factions:
pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-life advocates argue that abortions are murder and
extreme levels of child abuse. While pro-choice advocates believe abortions are
a justifiable means to end pregnancies. The pro-choice argument is that the
fetus is not yet a human being and its rights should not override that of the
mother's.
An importance on what defines a human is very important. Is a
human the result of sperm fertilizing an egg? At this point of fertilization the
human is composed of a single cell with a unique DNA structure. Killing this
unique cell would be wrong, however does this single cell constitute for a
person? If being human is defined through having a certain level of self
awareness and acknowledgment of your person, then the fetus is not yet a human
being so aborting it would be as immoral as destroying a malignant tumor (Shrage
127).
Should emphasis be placed on intelligence and awareness when
interpreting what a human being is? A fetus is not a form of intelligent life
because it has not yet had any experience, so therefore probably hasn't had
thoughts. In his essay, Rene Descartes, argues that we truly exist because we
can doubt our existence. He states, "If I completely stop thinking, I would
completely cease to exist". In this sense of existence is it possible for an
unborn child to doubt their existence, or truly think? (Kessler 325).
"It
could be said that a person should have an interest in their own future before
they earn the right to it" (Shrage 8). Even if a fetus is defined as a human
being because it has a potential life, if the fetus does not yet aspire to live.
It is impossible to argue that the fetus values its future yet, so why should it
have a right to it?
It could be argued that as the child could not possibly
survive independently of the mother, at least before approximately four months
into the pregnancy, it is not yet an independent human being, but an attachment
of the mother, therefore she should be allowed to terminate it, if this is what
she wants to do to herself, as opposed to when the child is physically
independent of the mother, when any potentially life ending action against it
would be inflicted upon the child directly, not its mother (Kellough 35).
Based on the view that the fetus is already a small baby, some extreme
anti-abortionists would maintain that abortion is impermissible even to save the
mothers life. The rationale behind this view would be that the child is
innocent, and killing the child would be active, on the other hand, letting the
mother die would be passive. This introduces two new concepts, the first being
the mother's rights in competition to those of the fetus and the second being
the question of innocence and how we would define this (Langley).
The
majority of abortions, however, are not performed in the interests of saving the
mothers life, but to deter inconvenience and difficulty on either her part, or
the child's. For example, the mother may feel she is unable to raise a child in
her current situation or the child may be born severely disabled. It may be
acceptable to some to sacrifice the fetus in order save the mother, but not to
abort the fetus in order to please the mother.
If a fetus is aborted because
the mother does not view it as the potential child she had hoped for, this is
effectively grading human life. Even though the fetus is partly a product of the
mother, does this give her the right to decide whether it should live, because
in truth the fetus is a separate life form from the mother- whereas a different
type of cell cluster (like skin cells) are part of her (Shrage 56).
Many
people claim that the mother should have a right to choose what happens to her
own body, but this does not take into account that she is also choosing what
happens to another person's body, even if it is not yet fully formed. On the
other hand, the fetus is within her body and she produced it, she should have
the right to terminate it as she does to remove any other part of her body.
The case of Roe vs. Wade made the option of abortions legal to women across
the nation. The struggle still remains on the moral ethics behind it. Is
abortion the murder of an unborn child? Many argue that the rights of the mother
exceed the rights of the fetus, and that while the fetus is a living organism it
does not constitute for a human being. With these aspects in mind the concept of
abortion is justifiable.
Bibliography
Kellough, Gail. Aborting Law: An Exploration of the Politics of
Motherhood and
Medicine. Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1996.
Kessler, Gary E. Voices of Wisdom. California: California State
University, 2001.
http://hometown.aol.com/abtrbng/index.htm 11/20/01.
Langley, Sharon. "Pro-Choice and Proud"
http://www.irish-times.com/irish%2Dtimes/paper/1997/0512/fea1.html 11/20/01.
Shrage, Laurie. Moral Dilemmas of Feminism : Prostitution, Adultery, and
Abortion.
New York : Routledge, 1994.
|
